|
Welcome to The VERB!
I
had another V-8 moment the other day. And I really wish I'd stop it
because I'm usually holding a glass or a cup when I hit my forehead, and
that hurts.
But I digress.
We've reached the end of another
writing contest, and it's time to announce the results. This is also the
time when I'll receive a slew of emails from entrants asking what was
wrong with their entry and why they didn't win. I completely understand
the curiosity, and although I'd like to provide free feedback for every
submission—especially to those who erroneously presume that because
their story didn't win, it must be bad—there's simply
no way I can do that and still eat. (This is why we now offer the half
price
Contest Opinion for those who want an analysis of their
work.)
But there is something I'd like to
address here, something that came from a particular email and perhaps
something you yourself have wondered. (Note: Under no circumstances,
including the elimination of my music and Dr. Pepper, would I publicly
discuss an email or a submission without the expressed written consent
of the NFL… um, I mean, the author in question.)
Elizabeth, just how do you choose
the Honorable Mentions and the Winner from so many? It can't be the
writing only, can it?
The short answer, it's a process. The long answer, well, before I tell you the
long answer, I realized (insert V-8 moment here) that maybe
many of you wonder if this is a popularity contest or one in which
bribes, bottles of wine and bars of chocolate come into play, and that
maybe I should open up and let you know how I, one contest judge, go through the process of
choosing the Winner and Honorable Mentions.
Let's begin at the beginning: finding
the appropriate music. This time, I read entries accompanied by Sarah McLachlan's
Mirrorball. (Get it?
Mirror, mirror on the wall?) I don't always choose music based solely on
the contest title, but this one was just too cool to ignore. The music has to pull its weight—melodic,
inspiring, unobtrusive—and
this CD delivered on all counts. Nice job, Sarah.
Next, I curl up with my lappy (that's
laptop for all you newbies) and open the file labeled, in this case,
"Silent Character Contest." This file was created the first
day of the contest. I've also set up my email account to automatically
forward a copy of each submission to another account that
can be accessed on my PC, should my lappy crash. Shhhh, let's not speak
of that which we should not speak.
So with the music playing, beverage flowing and
breeze blowing, I commence the act of reading. Every single submission, from beginning to end.
Yes, to the
very last word. I know some judges who stop reading as soon as they lose
interest, and that's fine. We all have the right to decide how to use
our time. I just figure that if a writer takes the time to submit, the least I can do is read the entire thing. Even when I
know after the first paragraph—and yeah, after reading stacks of
submissions, you do tend to know these things early on—that an entry is
lacking in some way, I keep reading. All contest submissions deserve that
much.
Since entries start showing up on the first day and steadily arrive throughout the
allotted time period, I usually set aside at least an hour a day just
for them, to avoid a huge backup. Sometimes I peruse them over lunch—my
latest, a steamy bowl of soup with whole grain
Goldfish crackers—or whenever I've taken a break from my other
work. Seldom do I focus on contest entries all day long because I can
easily burn out that way, and I want to remain fresh and enthusiastic
while I explore your imagination.
After I complete an entry, I have one
of two words dancing in my head. Either yep or nope. If it's a no, I close the entry
and move on to the next one. If it's a yes, I move that entry to another
file titled, "Contest Maybes." I continue this procedure until I've
exhausted the list.
This is called the First Round.
After the contest has officially ended, I return
to the "Contest Maybes" file and read again. This is when my editorial focus
narrows considerably. These entries caught my eye on the first run
for some reason: voice, characters, dialogue, overall story or all of the above. But now I
study the execution. And you can read more about that process in an
earlier
article. The ones that still hold up, remain in the "Maybes" file.
Those that don't, return to the original contest file.
This is called the Second Round.
I
let those remaining ones set for a few days and
then go back one last time. This is when a great story that
adheres 100% to the guidelines will win over a great story with
misspelled words, bad grammar and poor formatting. It's the little things, y'know? For
instance, I can tell, just by the way you label your email subject,
whether you've read the contest guidelines. This doesn't mean the wrong subject line
will exclude a story from the contest—that would be just a tad tyrannical—but I
notice. Agents and editors do as well. It's a small thing,
but it has rescued many a submission from the junk file.
This final stage, by the way, is the
most difficult. These entries are truly the crème de la crème
and selecting the best is not a simple thing. Believe it or not, there
have been times when I actually had to shut off my music during this
stage so that I might ponder which one, in my opinion, rises to the highest
peak.
So after all these years—seven, to be
exact—you've seen many Winners and Honorable Mentions come and go. And
if you presumed they were judged by anything other than content, or that
they were the only worthy ones in the entire stack, you were badly
mistaken. I apologize for not clearing this up a long, long time ago.
In the future, I'll
post the First Round and Second Round Finalists on the website as soon
as they're available. I
can't give a specific date—it'll depend on the
amount of entries and my schedule—but when I post, I'll announce it on
Twitter.
If you don't have a Twitter account,
and don't plan to open one, occasionally stop by the
Contest Café
after the contest ends. The Winner and Honorable Mentions will continue to
be announced here in The VERB.
A special congrats to our Winner,
Derek Cockey! You'll notice his entry is, shall we say, grittier than previous
ones, but
hey, life isn't always pretty. You may read "Lucky Day," and my
Opinion of it, on Page 7 of this issue.
Oh, and I went ahead and
posted the
entire results for the Silent Character Contest. A round of applause
for all the entrants! Your imaginations did some wonderful things with a
mirror. I hope our new contest sparks as much literary stimulation.
Elizabeth Guy
Editor

 |
The VERB
is published
once a month.

It is sent
exclusively
to those who
requested and
confirmed a
subscription.

To manage yours,
please use
the form below.

To change your
email address,
simply unsubscribe
the old address
and subscribe
the new one.
This issue
was published
under the musical
influence of...

PANDORA
Internet Radio
(1990s rock)
|